Purely Functional Data Structures
Purely Functional Data Structures refer to data structures that can be manipulated only through the application of functions, ensuring immutability where no part of the data structure can be changed after its creation. Instead, operations on these structures result in the creation of new structures. This paradigm aligns with the principles of Functional Programming, where functions are treated as first-class citizens and state changes are avoided.
History and Context
- 1996: The term gained significant attention with the publication of the book Purely Functional Data Structures by Chris Okasaki. This book provided a comprehensive exploration of how to implement traditional data structures in a purely functional manner, optimizing for time and space efficiency.
- Background: Prior to this, functional programming languages like Haskell and LISP had already implemented many of these concepts, but Okasaki's work formalized and expanded upon them.
Key Concepts
- Persistence: A core feature of purely functional data structures is persistence, where old versions of the structure remain accessible after modifications. This is achieved by sharing structure between versions rather than copying the entire structure.
- Structural Sharing: To optimize space and time complexity, these structures often use structural sharing. This technique ensures that common parts of different versions of the data structure are not duplicated but shared.
- Lazy Evaluation: Some structures utilize lazy evaluation, where computation is deferred until its result is needed. This is particularly useful in functional languages with support for lazy evaluation like Haskell.
Examples of Purely Functional Data Structures
- Binary Search Trees: In a purely functional setting, operations like insertion do not alter the tree but return a new tree with the inserted node.
- Heaps: Functional heaps like leftist heaps or skew heaps, which maintain their heap property through structural sharing.
- Lists: Functional lists where prepending an element is an O(1) operation, creating a new list head while the tail remains unchanged.
Advantages
- Thread Safety: Since no in-place updates occur, these structures are inherently thread-safe, reducing the need for locks in concurrent programming.
- Concurrency: Facilitates easier implementation of concurrent and parallel algorithms.
- Code Simplification: Reduces the complexity of reasoning about program correctness due to the absence of side effects.
Challenges
- Performance Overhead: The creation of new data structures can lead to performance overhead compared to imperative structures, especially for frequent updates.
- Memory Usage: Although structural sharing mitigates some memory use, it might still be higher than imperative counterparts for certain operations.
External Resources
Related Topics